seen and heard

Purchase Order Terms and Conditions-Part IV: Infringement, Confidentiality, Reverse Engineering

January 15, 2021
Frank P. Nagorney and Brent M. Buckley

This last advisory in our four-part series covering purchase order terms and conditions will discuss infringement claims and protecting your intellectual property.

What Does the UCC Say About Infringement?

The UCC provides that when goods are sold by a merchant who regularly deals in goods of that particular kind, the seller warrants those goods to be free of any “rightful” infringement claim of a third person. However, a buyer who furnishes product specifications to the seller must hold the seller harmless against any infringement claim arising out of compliance with those specifications. The warranty covers patent and trademark infringements. The “no infringement” warranty can be excluded by specific language in the contract.

What About Confidential Information, Trade Secrets and Services?

Because the UCC does not address these and other intellectual property, parties often enter into a separate confidentiality agreement. However, it is good practice to include terms and conditions in the contract that address patent and trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, and confidential information. If services are being sold at the same time, then the contract should likewise cover services.

For example, a buyer should prohibit seller from using the buyer’s trade secret specifications to make similar products for sale to third parties. On the other hand, a seller using its own trade secret technology, such as software source code, should prohibit any reverse engineering of its products. Therefore, the contract should address the concerns of both the buyer and seller, and include provisions which protect their respective intellectual property.

Wrapping Up.

The purpose of this series was to bring some focus on the terms and conditions that affect all goods bought and sold every day, and which often are overlooked. We encourage you to review your contracts to ensure that the terms and conditions mitigate risk and protect your interests.

Recent Articles

FTC Proposes Banning Non-Competes

Advisory: FTC Proposes Banning Non-Competes CLEVELAND, OH, January 16, 2023 – FTC v. Non-Competition Agreements Non-competition agreements ("Non-Competes") have long been the subject of passionate business disputes, ruined personal and professional relationships,...

Buckley King Welcomes New Attorneys

Buckley King Welcomes New Attorneys CLEVELAND, OH (January 2022) – Buckley King is pleased to announce that Ian Quinn, Kevin Carroll, and Kevin Wallace have joined the firm. Ian Quinn has dedicated his career to real estate and business in both the transactional sense...

Buckley King Attorneys Recognized as 2022 Super Lawyers

Buckley King Attorneys Recognized as 2022 Super Lawyers CLEVELAND, OH (January 2022) – Super Lawyers’ attorney-led research team has designated the following Buckley King attorneys as 2022 Ohio Super Lawyers.  “With no more than five percent of attorneys in Ohio...

Patentability vs. Freedom-to-Operate

Patentability vs. Freedom-to-Operate March 12, 2021 Dominic A. Frisina You are not alone if you do not know the difference between patentability and freedom-to-operate. Most often people believe that a patent grants them the right to make, use, and sell an invention....

Buckley King Attorneys Recognized as 2021 Super Lawyers

Buckley King Attorneys Recognized as 2021 Super Lawyers February 15, 2021 Super Lawyers' attorney-led research team has designated the following Buckley King attorneys as 2021 Ohio Super Lawyers. "Only five percent of attorneys across Ohio receive such recognition --...

Want to learn more?